|
A reduced
glycemic load diet is better than a reduced fat diet in helping
obese adolescents lose weight and keep it off, according to a
study reported in the August issue of the Archives of Pediatric
and Adolescent Medicine.
Glycemic
index measures how fast a particular food is likely to raise one's blood sugar.
Glycemic load takes into account a food's glycemic index as well as the amount
of carbohydrates per serving it contains. Researchers
at Children's Hospital in Boston experimented with how 14 obese adolescents between
the ages of 13 to 21 years would respond on a reduced glycemic load diet compared
to a conventional reduced fat diet.
The reduced
glycemic load diet consisted of 45 percent to 50 percent carbohydrates
and 30 percent to 35 percent fat and emphasized such food as nonstarchy
vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts and diary products. In contrast,
the conventional reduced-fat diet consisted of more carbohydrates,
55 percent to 60 percent, and less fat, 25 percent to 30 percent.
The
reduced glycemic load dieters were instructed to balance consumption of carbohydrates
with protein and fat at every meal and snack. The dieters had great flexibility
in choosing their food in light of preliminary evidence suggesting that greater
satiety and decreased voluntary energy intake occurs among children and adolescents
on such diets. The
reduced-fat diet was prescribed with emphasis on limiting dietary fat intake and
increasing the intake of grains, vegetables and fruits.
Body mass index and fat mass decreased significantly more in the reduced glycemic
load group than the reduced-fat group at the end of the study with no weight regain
in the former group between six and 12 months after the study. The
researchers attributed the weight loss in the reduced glycemic load dieters to
their feelings of being less hungry and/or feeling more full after meals and snacks
than the reduced-fat group. Not
surprisingly, the researchers found that motivation varied widely among all the
adolescents involved. "Although most participating parents were well intentioned,
not all provided adequate support with regard to provision of recommended foods,
transportation to counseling sessions and encouragement," the researchers
noted. The researchers
added that study participants often enjoyed socializing with peers at food courts
and fast-food restaurants where they were challenged to make choices that conformed
to their diets. "Research
is needed to develop novel strategies for motivating obese adolescents to change
their eating behaviors and for motivating parents to provide appropriate support
in environments that pose challenges to adherence," the researchers concluded. Other
sources: Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine 2003;157:773-779
|